Luke 4:14-21 January 26, 2025 Epiphany 3
I just want to remind people that I don’t pick out
these scripture readings myself.
These were chosen by a committee
in the 1970s and 80’s.
And sometimes I think they made weird choices
that are wrong for the day.
and sometimes it’s kind of spooky how well
it coordinates with current events
and challenges your preachers to
to not get complacent. This is one of the spooky
times.
So this
is Jesus first sermon.
This is kind of a two-parter scripture wise.
Next week we’ll talk about the reaction of
Jesus home community that he was preaching to.
Which is very interesting.
This week, we focus on the scripture he read
and the very short sermon he preached.
This
is the beginning of Jesus ministry,
the first thing he does after his baptism.
He does some preaching stints around Galilee.
He goes into Nazareth, his hometown,
where his old friends and family would be.
And he reads this scripture.
It’s
basically Jesus’ inaugural address.
Jesus is setting up vision statement for his
ministry.
and the ideal of what his church should be.
If we were
going to choose
one thing from the Old Testament to read
to epitomize Jesus’ ministry what would it be?
Some
might say the story of
Adam and Eve and the serpent,
maybe the 10 commandments,
the story of Moses and the Exodus,
Abraham and Sarah, one of the psalms
there are a lot of options to choose from.
But
Luke, the writer of one of only four gospels we have,
chooses to highlight this one reading.
It’s from Isaiah 61
The
one that Jesus reads
he
“has been anointed to
bring
good news to the poor.
release
to the captives
recovery
of sight to the blind,
to
let the oppressed go free,
and
to proclaim the Year of the Lord’s Favor.”
That
was the scripture reading.
This
is the vision statement for the gospel.
Maybe
not what the people were expecting.
Maybe
not what we would expect.
Good
news to the poor?
When we think about what Christianity has been
and
what the most vocal portion of Christianity has become.
This
might seem as far from it as you can get.
For
a very long time, Christianity has been used to
prop
up and defend the powerful and the wealthy.
And
the fear of retribution or loss of funding has
made
the Christian Church complicit in many
of
the saddest moments of our history.
The
Church of Christ has been silent
or has been used to support the ruling class,
brutal politics, war, economic
exploitation, slavery, and genocide.
Our
own Martin Luther used his theology
to
support the government’s harsh treatment and
slaughter
of the poor during the peasants revolt of 1525.
And
as we’ll learn more in the class on Bonhoeffer,
the
church in Germany and around the world was
either
silent about the persecution of Jews in Europe
by
the Nazis or supported it personally and vocally.
Historically,
we have not followed Jesus vision statement
that
he puts forward in this gospel.
And
you know the church today is not doing
such
a bang up job of being good news to the poor.
At
best, churches and pastors and bishops are silent.
Afraid
to speak up because of reactions or retributions.
At
worst, some churches have encouraged the terrible
treatment
of the poor and oppressed and homeless.
The
hate and vitriol against gay, lesbian, and transgender people
has
been led by parts of the Christian church.
The
prosperity Gospel that’s sold in many
mega
churches in the US has presented poverty
as
a personal, moral failing and not a societal problem.
Much of the hew and cry for the deportation of
undocumented immigrants has come from
the segments of the Christian church.
Lots
of churches and leaders, including our own in the ELCA,
make
a kind of statement when they sit on the sidelines
and
remain silent about these things.
Or
just make generic, mealy mouthed statements
about
getting along with one another and agreeing to disagree.
Many
times when churches or leaders do speak up
When
we talk about poverty and justice and immigrants,
other
leaders or people inside and outside the church
say
that churches shouldn’t be involved in politics.
When
these things come up,
we’re
supposed to be focused only on spiritual
things,
on
heaven and hell and not the things of this world.
But
is that really what we’re supposed to do?
I
think that Jesus’s vision today in his sermon
and
at the beginning of his ministry is pretty clear:
Good
news to the poor.
Sight to the blind.
Release to the captives.
Help
the oppressed go free.
That
sounds like the things of this world to me.
That
sounds pretty political.
It
doesn’t sound ethereal or spiritual.
That
sounds like someone’s status quo will be disrupted
That
sounds like someone’s gonna get a nasty letter.
It
sounds like something real is supposed to happen.
Now I have to bring up this sermon given at the
National
Prayer service for the inauguration
of
the president this week.
I
wasn’t going to, really.
But
the scripture is kind of begging for it.
I am glad that I’m in a church
where I can talk about it
because
lots of my colleagues are not.
This sermon was given by Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde.
It
was given at the Washington National Cathedral.
Her church, basically. It was a lovely, appropriate sermon,
about
unity, and the importance of humility, honesty,
honoring
the dignity of all people.
Stuff
we kind of talk about all the time.
At
the end, she asked the president directly to have mercy.
That’s
it.
Have
mercy for Transgender people who are scared.
Have
mercy on the people who pick our crops and
clean
our office buildings who might be fleeing
war
zones and persecution. who are scared.
She
asked the president – the most powerful person in our country—
to
be merciful to some of the least powerful people in our country.
A
rather innocuous request from a pastor if I heard one.
But,
of course, it’s not just about what’s said,
it’s
about the context its said in.
And
this was very courageous of the bishop.
Well,
some people lost their minds.
The
president was offended and asked for an apology
calling
her a “so-called bishop”.
And
certain people from congress passed a resolution
stating
that the sermon was a display of “political activism
and
condemned its distorted message.”
But
more concerning to me was the response of
church
people who are furious over it.
calling
the bishop a “crazy woman” and a “witch” and a “God hater”
One
pastor accused the bishop of the “Sin of Empathy.”
I
am not kidding
This
is a thing in certain portions of the church.
“The
sin of compassion and empathy”
I’ll
talk more about people’s reactions next week,
when
we hear about how the people of Jesus home town
tried
to throw him off a cliff.
But
today, I just want to say that these people
who
condemned this were not offended by
the
Bishop and her preaching.
They
are offended by Jesus.
They
should actually read the sermon on the mount
and
see what kind of resolution gets passed in congress.
Shane
Claibourne is an Evangelical theologian he wrote
yesterday
about this moment in our history
in
an article he called “a collision of two Christianities”
He said there have been two different versions of
Christianity in our country and our world for centuries.
Two
very different versions of how to follow Christ.
One
that tries to follow Jesus teachings and example and
one
that uses Jesus as a tool for personal and political power.
He
comes to this conclusion:
The
word “Christian” means “Christ-like.”
If it doesn’t look like Jesus, and it
doesn’t sound like Jesus … let’s not call it Christianity.
If it’s not about
love and mercy … let’s not call it Christianity.
If it’s not good news to the
poor … let’s not call it Christianity.
If it’s not about welcoming the
stranger … let’s not call it Christianity.
In his parables and the way he treated others, he gives us a
vision.
In the way he lived and the way he died, he gave us a vision.
He gives us a vision in this sermon.
God has anointed him and therefore anointed us
to bring good news to the poor,
to give sight to the blind,
to give release to the captives
and let the oppressed go free.
This is what it is to carry the name Christian.
This is what it is to be like Christ.
Let these words be fulfilled in us
every time we hear them.
No comments:
Post a Comment