October 11, 2026
Matthew
22: 1-14
Banquet
Hyatt Moore
We
love this parable! Yay.
And it makes us uncomfortable.
There’s
a banquet! It’s great! Yay.
And there’s destroying cities.
It’s
a party for everyone, good and bad,
everyone that usually isn’t invited to parties! Yay.
But then
there’s that poor guy who didn’t
wear a wedding coat, thrown into the outer darkness.
Dark Jesus is
back again with another parable.
But don’t despair.
Remember, he’s still talking to the religious
leaders.
And Matthew wants us to know that Jesus was very
upset
with them and he told them directly and publicly.
And Matthew has a flair for the dramatic.
And remember,
we don’t have to throw everything out
that we know and believe about grace.
We just have to remember that when Jesus talks like
this,
it’s important to him and he wants them to know it.
Let
me tell you, Luke’s version of this parable
is more palatable. It’s very nice and there’s no
city-wide destruction and no outer darkness
or wailing and gnashing of teeth, you can read that
one Luke 14.
But
still, we’re not in Luke this year, we’re in Matthew
And Matthew tries to grab us in with exciting
descriptions and consequences.
And this is the parable we’ve been given today
so we have to deal with it.
And maybe it’s not all bad news.
So let’s
start with the basics:
Jesus says the Kingdom is like this:
It’s
like a King who has wedding banquet.
The
kingdom of God is like a party! Yay!
I mean it’s
nice to think of God as throwing parties.
For a couple thousand years, the church and God
and everything involved with it has been
depicted as a drag, a bunch of sad, serious, wet
blankets.
The Church has been the ones telling
couples on the dance floor to separate and turn
down the loud music.
I remember one
member in my last congregation saying that when
she was young she was told that she needed
to stop smiling when she was going up for communion.
People have confused spirituality with stoicism.
And joy with disrespect.
But that’s not God’s way, that’s our interpretation.
And that, I think that is part of the
understanding of this story
I’m sure the religious leaders didn’t see God as
throwing parties.
They were
doing their own thing, and not God’s thing.
They forgot all the lessons their fore-fathers and
mothers had
taught about God’s love, forgiveness, inclusion,
abundance,
and all the rest of it, and they decided to take the
easy way out.
The way of the world. The way of scarcity and fear,
threats and judgement,
in order to control people and get what they want.
But
God’s way, God’s kingdom is like a celebration,
So the
Kingdom of God is like a celebration.
With great food, and drink, and decoration.
And he invites the usual suspects, other important people:
politicians, business execs, doctors, lawyers, art gallery curators,
celebrities, and of course, religious leaders.
But they’re not interested in the king’s party.
They want to keep doing their own thing.
As
I said, Jesus is talking to the religious leaders.
They’ve
been entrusted with God’s people,
and
they’ve forgotten about God’s invitations.
They’ve
used and threatened the poor and
hungry
and sick instead of helping them.
They’re
living in comfort, assured of their
own
place in God’s favor, and the people they’re supposed
to
be serving are starving for food and grace.
And
since they presented themselves as the only way to God,
they’re
blocking everyone’s way.
They’ve
been invited to the party that the King
is
throwing, and they’re not showing up to it.
Not
only that, they’ve killed the people who
have
invited them to the party.
This
is foreshadowing Jesus eventual crucifixion
and
Jesus is also referring to the many prophets,
like John the Baptist, who have been killed for criticizing
the religious leaders
and the government they’ve been colluding with.
This
is one of Jesus biggest beefs with the religious leaders.
They
are colluding with the Roman government to elevate
their
position and control and intimidate the people.
Jesus
is saying that God does not like that.
God does not like it when religious leaders collude
with governments in order to control
and intimidate.
God
doesn’t like it when religious leaders do that NOW,
and
he didn’t like it then. They traded in the way of life
and
joy for the way of death and fear.
I
must digress now to talk about something so
distressing
in our own government.
I
mean it’s like a firehose of distressing things lately,
but
this one really takes the cake.
The pentagon has announced that the first military execution
to take a place since
1961 will be livestreamed.
Made
available on TV for anyone to watch.
Putting
aside the debate about whether the United States
should
still be persisting with the death penalty in the first place—
Using
the death penalty for entertainment is actually frightening.
dictatorships
do that.
The
Secretary of State has claimed his Christian identity
publicly
many times, and he’s forced service people to attend
Christian
prayer services and sermons with his Christian
spiritual
advisor, who has some very nutty ideas himself.
I’m
not going to mince words here.
Putting
a death on display like this is a dangerous path.
And putting death on display like this and using Christianity
as a mantle at the
same time does more serious damage to Christianity.
It’s
barbaric. The Roman government did that with Christian martyrs.
And
it’s what the Roman Government did with Jesus.
I’m
horrified as a citizen and as a Christian.
As
I was saying God does not like it when religious leaders
collude
with governments in order to control and intimidate.
I
think Jesus would have a lot of serious stuff to say to this,
so I feel I have to say something now.
End
of digression.
So
this King is mad at the people who rejected his invite,
and
also murdered the ones bringing the invitation.
So
the King has them killed and their city destroyed.
Now
it may be difficult to believe that the way of
life
is what Jesus is offering here when the
parable
is so violent and threatening itself.
(Did
I tell you that Luke’s is a lot better?
No
cities burned in that one.)
But
when these parables get crazy like this
we
have to remember that Jesus is angry.
He’s
taking this business very seriously
and
he’s using the language of violence, which maybe the language
these
religious leaders seem to understand best.
Do
I believe that God is destroying people and cities
like
the King in this parable? No I don’t.
But do I share a little of Matthew’s desire for a little earthly justice
and retribution
for the forces that defy God so blatantly?
Yes,
a little if I’m honest.
But
I like to interpret parables and stories like this
more
hopeful for the future instead:
The
places built on hatred and fear and violence,
and rejection of God’s way of love and grace are just not sustainable.
They will
not survive.
They
either destroy themselves, or find their way back to God.
So
that was the first distressing part of this parable.
So
the party’s ready and the food is there but no one
that
the King has invited wants to come.
So
the King asks his people to invite everyone else
everyone else who might actually do things God’s
way.
Everyone that no one would have thought to invite
before.
And they do,
they don’t care who they ask: “Good and bad” it says.
Luke’s gospel describes the poor, the crippled, the
blind, the lame.
This is how
Jesus was operating when he came to town.
The religious leaders weren’t celebrating with God, so Jesus
had to get other people, tax collectors and prostitutes to join him at
his table.
He got the disciples fishermen and other regular
joes
to join him.
We know who they would be today.
We know who our own normally uninvited are in our
day.
In God’s way, the table – real and metaphorically,
is opened up to everyone.
And that’s
the another great thing about this parable,
At God’s party everyone is invited. Yay!
The
earliest church knew this, and it was known
for having rich and poor together, Jew and Greek, slave and free,
male and female, no one else did that at the time
and that was the earliest Christian calling card,
they were all one in Christ.
Rachel
Held Evans, the popular millennial
theologian who sadly died in 2019 wrote:
“The apostles remembered what many modern
Christians tend to forget—that what makes the gospel offensive
isn’t who it keeps out, but
who it lets in.”
Still,
today, the thought of inviting everyone
to the table and to the party is a
scandal to many.
Excluding people with threats of hell
are powerful.
And people like to hold onto that power.
So
the Kingdom of God is like a party,
and the party is happening whether we want
to participate or not,
and everyone who normally isn’t invited
to parties is invited,
(and those who ARE normally invited can
come too.)
So Yay! For radical banquets that can’t
be stopped!
But
that brings us to the other really
concerning part of this parable,
the King and that guest and his wedding garment, or
lack of it.
To us it
might look like the king is just mad because someone
was not wearing the right clothes or didn’t have the
right look.
I know some of those joyless preachers in the past
have used this bit of the parable as an excuse to
tell people
they had to dress right in church.
But that’s kind of a ridiculous take.
So
at the time, weddings at that time were kind of surprises,
the date wasn’t set a long time in advance.
When the time was right, the wedding started,
and someone would go out into the neighborhood,
and let them all know that the wedding was about to
start,
and everyone was supposed to stop what they were in
the middle of,
they would take their wedding robe out of the closet
and go.
And if they didn’t have one,
the host would provide a wedding robe at the door.
The
wedding robe was a garment that was simple
and
non-descript, and everyone’s robe was similar,
meaning
that everyone looked the same:
the
king looked the same as the ditch-digger,
the
farm hand looked the same as the business owner.
To
wear the robe was a sign of solidarity, unity, humbleness
and honor for the host and for the rest of the
guests.
As I said, if they were too poor to have one on
hand,
they would have been given one at the door.
So the man
who came in wasn’t just flighty
and forgot, or too poor to afford one,
he would have had to reject it.
To not wear it, was a snub, it was arrogance even.
With
Matthew’s own flair for the dramatic,
he’s saying that everyone is invited to the party.
Yay.
But it’s not just a free-for-all,
anarchy party.
Yay still.
Those kind of parties make me nervous.
God’s party is open to all people, it’s true.
And when we come to God’s party,
we’re asked to behave differently than before.
We’re not asked to change our identity, or our gifts,
or our uniqueness,
we’re not asked to conform in those ways.
But
we are asked to wear
The garments that cover our status and,
our superiority, our self-righteousness
and our judgmental nature that we left
the house with,
and we are asked to be imitators of
Christ:
and we are asked to put on Christ’s
garments of
abundance, love, forgiveness, joy,
inclusion,
service, self-sacrifice, and care for
everyone around us.
Welcome everyone at the table. Yay
again.
Putting on that robe, and following Christ’s way
is how we keep this party going for
everyone.
So don’t dwell in the outer darkness,
don’t worry about the wailing and
gnashing of teeth.
Don’t worry about those things.
Just know that Jesus is really serious
about God’s party.
Jesus really wants us to believe in
God’s abundance.
Just
put on Christ’s garments,
and come to the banquet that God
has prepared for everyone.
