Luke
15: 1-3,11-32
March 27, 2022
4 Lent
It only shows up in the gospel of Luke,
not in any of the other gospels.
We call it the parable of the Prodigal
Son
Jesus doesn’t use that word in his
story,
but that’s what people have called it
through the ages.
But after thinking about the parable,
I’m not sure, if I agree with the title: Prodigal Son.
If you look up the
meaning of the word Prodigal,
The first definition is “to live a wasteful life” The next is:
“One
who spends money extravagantly,
viciously,
or without necessity;
one
that is profuse or lavish in any expenditure;
a waster; a spendthrift”
That certainly is
an appropriate description for the son.
He asks his father for his inheritance
early,
while the father is still alive – which
is really rude when you think about it –
kind of like saying, “I wish you were
dead”.
and the father almost naively gives it
to him.
Then
the son takes all of that money that he demanded
and he immediately squanders it away
until he has nothing.
So I guess
the word “prodigal” does apply to the son.
But I
still don’t think the story should be called “The Prodigal Son”
Because it puts all the focus on that
one younger son,
And I don’t know that is what the story
is about.
Many
preachers have put their attention on the son,
and tried to make him a model of
behavior.
He messes up, yes, but he comes back,
he realizes
the error of his ways, he’s repentant,
begging forgiveness,
And that, in turn, is what we should
do.
The moral of the
story of the prodigal son is:
When we mess up, if we are truly
repentant and sorry
then, and only then,
God will take us back.
I have heard that
sermon before, haven’t you?
But is that what happens in Jesus
story?
In this story, I
don’t see a boy who is repentant.
I see a boy who is hungry. He wants to
eat.
He doesn’t go back wanting to reunite
with his family,
He doesn’t
realize his sinfulness,
He realizes that he is starving and he
wants some food.
He knows that his father has food
and he gives it to his servants and he
wants some of it.
This son doesn’t have change of heart, he hatches a plan.
He is drawn by his hunger, by his own need.
That is the story
that Jesus tells here,
and that, I
think, is an accurate picture
of a lot of
spiritual journeys.
I don’t think that most of us are drawn
back to God
by our need to repent.
I think most of us are drawn by other
needs that we have.
So I was born
Catholic, kind of went begrudgingly
to church through confirmation and then
pretty much
forgot about church and God and Jesus like
a lot of people
when I was in my teens and in my college years.
Then when I was in my late 20's I
started going again.
I went back to church for some various
reasons:
I had
just moved to New York City by myself
so I was lonely, I went to church, to find friends,
And I was
interested in religion, so I went to go learn about it.
Not bad
needs, but they were pretty self-centered.
I
didn’t go because I was repentant.
I didn’t go because I wanted to serve
or help anyone.
I don’t even know that I wanted a
relationship with God.
All that kind of snuck in later.
When I first
went back to church.
I went because
I wanted something.
But still, when I showed up
with my list of needs,
to that magical little Lutheran church
in New York City,
I was immediately accepted by the community.
I felt their love and the love of God
take me in.
I never had to
explain where I was all that time,
I never had to repent for my years of wandering
and my wanton ways, the way I had squandered
my spiritual inheritance for so many
years.
I never had to apologize for anything.
They were just really happy I showed
up.
Their acceptance changed my heart over
time,
but that’s not why I came back.
![]() |
Prodigal Son II Cody Miller |
He doesn’t go looking to renew a
relationship
with his father, he doesn’t go back
because he feels
bad about the way he treated his
family, he goes back for food.
He does regret his decisions, and he
rehearses his line of
repentance on his way home to his
father.
But before his father even knows why
he’s back, or what’s in his heart,
or even before the son has a chance to say
anything,
the father runs to the son, and takes
him in his arms
and throws him a big party.
So I don’t think
that Jesus’ focus in this story is on the son.
Remember,
this story comes after grumbling of the
Pharisees who
look at Jesus with contempt and say:
“This fellow welcomes sinners and eats with
them.”
The story is a response to the
complaining.
And Jesus includes the Pharisees in the
story.
In the story, the
older son is angry about the
fact that the
father gave a party for the younger son.
and I really understand that response.
If you put yourself in the place of
that older son,
you would want the father to do
something,
and not just let that younger son get
away with what he did.
The
father could have at least acted angry with him,
made him a slave, put him to some hard
work,
to teach him some kind of lesson.
But the father doesn’t merely forgive
him.
He is overjoyed at this presence, he throws
his son a party.
And that rubs the
older son wrong.
The older son
had done nothing wrong.
He stayed, he
did all the work, he didn’t leave.
He felt he deserved that ring
and that fatted calf.
That would have been the fair thing to
do.
But this is not a story about fairness.
After I was
involved with the church for a while
I was doing all kinds of work with it
and I was really invested.
and there
were times that I would look at people who
only showed occasionally
or they wouldn’t put in their
share of the
work and my mind would
go to the
same place of that older child.
“Why is
everyone treating them nice?
Why should they
have the same amount of say on things as I do?
I’m
the one who’s here every day.
What
are they doing on a council night?
Why
aren’t people happy to see me?”
My free acceptance back into a
community
didn’t stop me from thinking like that
older son sometimes.
And in the end of
this story, who is really the lost son?
Who is
missing out on the party?
The Pharisees
are like that jealous older brother
They are missing
out on the party that Jesus is throwing.
Instead of
joining in, they’re standing in the back,
jealous and
self-righteous. Instead of sitting down
and eating
with Jesus, they’re standing back and asking
“Why is he eating with them and not us?”
And Jesus
answers them with this parable.
And
that is why I don’t think this parable
should be called the Prodigal Son.
Because Jesus’ story is really about
the Prodigal Father.
Along with the
other definitions of Prodigal,
there was one
more. It also means :
“Very generous,
unsparing generosity, giving in abundance”.
This story is all about
the Prodigal Father.
This is the answer to the question:
“Why is Jesus
welcoming sinners and eating with them?”
Jesus talks about a father who isn’t
fair, but who is gracious.
How the father waits and hopes for his
lost child.
It is about how the father lavishes
both his children with gifts.
It is how the father loves both sons:
the impetuous, thoughtless one who ran
away,
as well as the self-righteous, sulking
one who stayed.
This is not about
what the children should do.
It is about what God has already
done.
We are reconciled to God because God is
reconciled to us.
Already.
Before we can even come back and say
anything,
God is eagerly waiting and hoping for
us.
God doesn’t wait for us to repent.
God doesn’t
push us aside until our hearts are changed.
God accepts us as we are and then
we have a change of heart.
God gives us
absolute unconditional grace,
and in the face of that we are humbled.
That is what Jesus
is trying to teach us with this story.
And that is
what Jesus tried to teach us that with his whole life.
Jesus didn’t go to people and say:
“if
you repent, then I will share a meal with you.”
Jesus gave them grace before he knew
where anyone’s heart was.
Jesus led with love. And that is the
lesson here:
Don’t worry
about people’s motives, or whether they’ve sinned,
or whether
they’re on the right path, or truly sorry.
Lead with
Love.
This, as much
as anything else, probably got Jesus killed.
I have to think
that at some point after that party,
the
younger son didn’t treat his father in the same callous way.
I’d like to think that the generosity
of his father humbled him.
I’d also like to think that the older
son let down his defenses
and went into the party and enjoyed
that fatted calf
with everyone else. Or maybe not. We
don’t know.
Because that’s not what the story’s
about.
In the end, this
story is not mainly about the sons,
the story is about the Father.
And that’s what this sermon is about
too.
Every
day, God gives us grace upon grace.
Every day God throws a huge party that
we haven’t earned.
Every day God rejoices at the sight of
us.
And wherever we’ve strayed to,
God welcomes us home.
No comments:
Post a Comment